Retos y estrategias para recuperar y dinamizar la atención primaria. Metodología DAFO (Debilidades, Amenazas, Fortalezas y Oportunidades)-CAME (Corregir, Afrontar, Mantener y Explotar) en un departamento de salud / Challenges and strategies to recover and dynamize primary care: SWOT-CAME analysis in a Health Department

Objetivo: Identificar fortalezas, obstáculos, cambios en el entorno y capacidades de los equipos y unidades de apoyo en atención primaria, con el objetivo de proporcionar atención de alta calidad en un área de salud integrada. Diseño: Estudio de métodos mixtos basado en la matriz DAFO y el análisis CAME. Emplazamiento: Atención primaria, Comunidad Valenciana. Participantes: En total han participado 271 profesionales de los diferentes colectivos y representantes de asociaciones de pacientes, 99 en la fase de captura de ideas, 154 en la fase de elaboración de la matriz DAFO y 18 en la fase de elaboración del análisis CAME. Intervenciones: Se condujo un análisis DAFO-CAME a partir del cual se establecieron líneas de acción. La captura de información se realizó mediante grupos nominales, la fase de consenso integrando al conjunto de profesionales mediante Delphi y conferencia de consenso. Mediciones principales: Priorización de propuestas para mantener las fortalezas, afrontar las amenazas, explotar las oportunidades, corregir las debilidades en el marco de un plan de acción de un área de salud integrada. Resultados: Se propusieron un total de 82 ideas diferentes (20 fortalezas, 40 debilidades, 4 amenazas, 12 oportunidades y 6 amenazas-oportunidades). Este análisis condujo a un plan estratégico con 7 líneas y 33 acciones/intervenciones priorizadas. Conclusiones: Atención integrada buscando fórmulas colaborativas entre niveles asistenciales, redefinición de roles, soluciones digitales, capacitación del personal y mejoras en equipamientos y procesos de soporte, junto a medidas para afrontar el envejecimiento de la población y las necesidades de centros sociosanitarios constituyen los retos sobre los que actuar.(AU)

Objective: To identify strengths, obstacles, changes in the environment, and capabilities of primary care teams and support units, with the aim of providing high-quality care in an integrated healthcare area. Design: Mixed methods study based on the SWOT matrix and CAME analysis. Location: Primary care, Valencian community. Participants: A total of 271 professionals from different collectives and patient association representatives participated. 99 in the idea generation phase, 154 in the SWOT matrix development phase, and 18 in the CAME analysis development phase. Interventions: A SWOT-CAME analysis was conducted, from which action lines were established. Information capture was carried out through nominal groups, and the consensus phase involved integrating all professionals through Delphi and consensus conference techniques. Main measurements: Prioritization of proposals to maintain strengths, address threats, exploit opportunities, and correct weaknesses within the framework of an integrated healthcare area action plan. Results: A total of 82 different ideas were proposed (20 strengths; 40 weaknesses; 4 threats; 12 opportunities; 6 threats-opportunities), which, once prioritized, were translated into 7 lines and 33 prioritized actions/interventions (CAME analysis). Conclusions: Integrated care, seeking collaborative approaches between care levels, redefining roles, digital solutions, staff training, and improvements in equipment and support processes, along with measures to address the aging population and the needs of socio-sanitary centers, constitute the challenges to be addressed.(AU)

Participación ciudadana, imprescindible en procesos comunitarios: experiencia en la realización del diagnóstico de salud de Santpedor / Citizen participation, essential in community processes: experience in the Santpedor health diagnosis

Introducción. En este artículo se quiere plasmar la grata experiencia de hacer un diagnóstico de salud en la población de Santpedor. El diagnóstico se llevó a cabo con acción participativa desde el primer momento y durante todo el proceso. Se hizo con un grupo motor, donde solo dos de las 15 personas que lo representan eran agentes sanitarios. Estos agentes legitimaron el proceso comunitario, coordinaron el grupo motor y lo guiaron. Sin embargo, eran una pieza más del puzle comunitario, siendo los otros 13 agentes comunitarios no sanitarios los auténticos protagonistas al posibilitar llegar a la población y completar el puzle comunitario. Objetivo. Realizar el diagnóstico de salud de Santpedor con acción participativa. Métodos. Se utilizó una metodología mixta secuencial y explicativa, con una parte cuantitativa (descriptivo transversal) y una parte cualitativa (acción participativa). En este artículo se explica la metodología que se utilizó para hacer el diagnóstico de salud de Santpedor y se describen las estrategias participativas para llegar a la población y favorecer la pertinencia en el proceso comunitario, así como las técnicas empleadas para la detección de las necesidades y su priorización. Las técnicas cualitativas utilizadas para la detección de los activos fueron el mapping party y la marcha de activos. Las técnicas empleadas para identificar las necesidades fueron la encuesta y las entrevistas grupales (grupos focales, grupo nominal y entrevistas individuales). Resultados. Se identificaron 604 activos de Santpedor. En el análisis cuantitativo se observó que Santpedor presentaba un gran relevo generacional y un tejido económico diversificado. En el análisis cualitativo, se logró una gran cantidad de información con la que, una vez analizada y trabajada con todo el grupo motor, se confeccionó un listado con 17 necesidades que había que cubrir para mejorar la salud de la población. ... (AU)

Introduction. In this paper we seek to capture the pleasant experience in making a health diagnosis in the Santpedor population. The diagnosis was made with participation from the very first moment and during the entire process. It was made with a driving group where only two of the 15 people representing it were health agents. These agents legitimized the community process, coordinated the driving group and guided it. However, they were just one more piece of the community puzzle, the other 13 non-health community agents being the real protagonists to reach the population and complete the community puzzle. Aim. To make a health diagnosis in Santpedor with the population taking part. Methods. A mixed explanatory sequential methodology was used. Comprised of a quantitative part (cross-sectional descriptive) and a qualitative part (participation). This paper explains the methodology used to made this. It reports the participation used to reach the population and favour relevance in the community process; as well as the techniques used to detect needs and their prioritization. The qualitative techniques used to detect assets were: mapping party, asset march. The techniques used to detect needs were by means of a survey ("bustiada") and group interviews (focus groups, nominal group and individual interviews). Results. A total of 604 Santpedor assets were identified. In the quantitative analysis, it was observed that Santpedor had a major generational change and a diversified economic fabric. In the qualitative analysis, a large amount of information was obtained which, once analyzed and worked on with the entire driving group, led to a list of 17 needs to improve the health of the population. These needs were prioritized by means of a simple vote, where a large citizen participation was attained with 754 votes from the citizens. The first need detected was "housing needs", followed by "public transportation needs", and "work needs". ... (AU)

The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality.

Importance: Implemented in 18 regions, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) was the largest US primary care delivery model ever tested. Understanding its association with health outcomes is critical in designing future transformation models. Objective: To test whether CPC+ was associated with lower health care spending and utilization and improved quality of care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Difference-in-differences regression models compared changes in outcomes between the year before CPC+ and 5 intervention years for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to CPC+ and comparison practices. Participants included 1373 track 1 (1 549 585 beneficiaries) and 1515 track 2 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) primary care practices that applied to start CPC+ in 2017 and met minimum care delivery and other eligibility requirements. Comparison groups included 5243 track 1 (5 347 499 beneficiaries) and 3783 track 2 (4 507 499 beneficiaries) practices, matched, and weighted to have similar beneficiary-, practice-, and market-level characteristics as CPC+ practices. Interventions: Two-track design involving enhanced (higher for track 2) and alternative payments (track 2 only), care delivery requirements (greater for track 2), data feedback, learning, and health information technology support. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was annualized Medicare Part A and B expenditures per beneficiary per month (PBPM). Secondary outcomes included expenditure categories, utilization (eg, hospitalizations), and claims-based quality-of-care process and outcome measures (eg, recommended tests for patients with diabetes and unplanned readmissions). Results: Among the CPC+ patients, 5% were Black, 3% were Hispanic, 87% were White, and 5% were of other races (including Asian/Other Pacific Islander and American Indian); 85% of CPC+ patients were older than 65 years and 58% were female. CPC+ was associated with no discernible changes in the total expenditures (track 1: $1.1 PBPM [90% CI, -$4.3 to $6.6], P = .74; track 2: $1.3 [90% CI, -$5 to $7.7], P = .73), and with increases in expenditures including enhanced payments (track 1: $13 [90% CI, $7 to $18], P < .001; track 2: $24 [90% CI, $18 to $31], P < .001). Among secondary outcomes, CPC+ was associated with decreases in emergency department visits starting in year 1, and in acute hospitalizations and acute inpatient expenditures in later years. Associations were more favorable for practices also participating in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and independent practices. CPC+ was not associated with meaningful changes in claims-based quality-of-care measures. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the timing of the associations of CPC+ with reduced utilization and acute inpatient expenditures was consistent with the theory of change and early focus on episodic care management of CPC+, CPC+ was not associated with a reduction in total expenditures over 5 years. Positive interaction between CPC+ and the Shared Savings Program suggests transformation models might be more successful when provider cost-reduction incentives are aligned across specialties. Further adaptations and testing of primary care transformation models, as well as consideration of the larger context in which they operate, are needed.

Atributos da atenção primária à sáude: a teoria e a prática em uma unidade de saúde da família na perspectiva de acadêmicos de medicina / Attributes of primary health care: theory and practice in a family health unit from the perspective of medical students / Atributos de la atención primaria de salud: teoría y práctica en una unidad de salud familiar desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes de medicina

A Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS), definida a partir da Declaração de Alma- Ata, e, identificada mundialmente como uma estratégia de organização dos serviços de saúde, caracteriza-se como o primeiro nível de contato dos indivíduos, da família e da comunidade com o sistema nacional de saúde. Este trabalho constitui um relato de experiência desenvolvido a partir de uma atividade teórico-prática, que se propôs a analisar os atributos e os processos de trabalho da Atenção Primária à Saúde no contexto de uma Unidade de Saúde da Família (USF), no município de Foz do Iguaçu-PR, com o objetivo de relacionar a teoria com a prática, por meio de questionários, elaborados com base na literatura e, aplicado aos profissionais e usuários do sistema de saúde. Ademais, contou com a observação da rotina do processo de trabalho na unidade. A vivência oportunizou a identificação dos desafios e fragilidades referentes aos atributos da APS e dos elementos constituintes do processo de trabalho em saúde. Por fim, conclui-se que, no cotidiano dos serviços, a APS enfrenta muitas dificuldades em se estabelecer como previsto na literatura e, por isso, faz-se premente a participação social para sua efetivação e consagração como primeiro nível de contato com o sistema de saúde.

Primary Health Care (PHC), defined from the Declaration of Alma-Ata, and identified worldwide as a strategy for organizing health services, is characterized as the first level of contact of individuals, family and community with the national health system. This paper is an experience report developed from a theoretical-practical activity, which proposed to analyze the attributes and work processes of Primary Health Care in the context of a Family Health Unit (USF) in the municipality of Foz do Iguaçu-PR, with the objective of relating theory to practice, through questionnaires, prepared based on the literature and applied to professionals and users of the health system. In addition, there was observation of the routine of the work process in the unit. The experience made it possible to identify the challenges and weaknesses related to the attributes of PHC and the constituent elements of the health work process. Finally, it is concluded that, in the daily life of services, PHC faces many difficulties in establishing itself as predicted in the literature and, therefore, social participation is necessary for its effectiveness and consecration as the first level of contact with the health system.

La Atención Primaria de Salud (APS), definida a partir de la Declaración de Alma-Ata, e identificada mundialmente como una estrategia de organización de los servicios de salud, se caracteriza por ser el primer nivel de contacto de los individuos, la familia y la comunidad con el sistema nacional de salud. Este trabajo es un relato de experiencia desarrollado a partir de una actividad teórico-práctica, que se propuso analizar los atributos y procesos de trabajo de la Atención Primaria de Salud en el contexto de una Unidad de Salud de la Familia (USF) en el municipio de Foz do Iguaçu- PR, con el objetivo de relacionar la teoría con la práctica, a través de cuestionarios, elaborados con base en la literatura y aplicados a profesionales y usuarios del sistema de salud. Además, hubo observación de la rutina del proceso de trabajo en la unidad. La experiencia permitió identificar los desafíos y debilidades relacionados con los atributos de la APS y los elementos constitutivos del proceso de trabajo en salud. Finalmente, se concluye que, en el día a día de los servicios, la APS enfrenta muchas dificultades para establecerse como predice la literatura y, por lo tanto, es necesaria la participación social para su eficacia y consagración como primer nivel de contacto con el sistema de salud. PALABRAS CLAVE: Atención Primaria de Salud; Sistema Único de Salud; Políticas de Salud.

Teleconsulta de enfermagem: desenvolvimento de plataforma para atendimento de casos de Covid-19 / Nursing teleconsultation: development of a platform for Covid-19 case management / Telecosulta en enfermería: desarrollo de una plataforma para el manejo de casos de Covid-19

Objetivo: Desenvolver uma plataforma virtual de Teleconsulta para atendimento a casos suspeitos de Síndromes Gripais e infecção por COVID-19. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo de natureza aplicada, com desenvolvimento de produção tecnológica e inovadora, prospectivo, ecológico, descritivo, de série temporal. A população do estudo foi formada por qualquer pessoa sintomática para Síndromes Gripais por COVID-19, suspeitos ou confirmados, de qualquer local do Brasil. Este estudo foi realizado em duas etapas, a saber: Etapa I: Desenvolvimento da Aplicação para Plataforma de Teleconsulta. Etapa II: atendimento por meio de Teleconsulta de Casos suspeitos de COVID-19 e Sindromes Gripais. A metodologia utilizada para o desenvolvimento da aplicação proposta foi a modelagem por prototipação evolucionária. Resultados: Foram realizados 209 atendimentos na Plataforma de Teleconsulta, sendo 151 (70%) do sexo feminino e 65 (30%) do sexo masculino, com prevalência de idade variando de 20 a 29 anos (41%). Quanto ao risco de infecção por COVID-19, 42 (20%) tinham alto risco, 75 (36%) médio risco e 92 (44%) baixo risco. Os sintomas mais prevalentes foram: secreção nasal ou espirros (53%), dores no corpo (49%), dor de cabeça (47%), dor de garganta (46%), tosse seca (35%), Febre (31%), falta de ar (25%) e diarreia (23%). Inicialmente o teleatendimento foi composto por teletriagem com classificação de risco com base na sintomatologia dos pacientes que foram codificados com pontuações conforme a gravidade do sintoma para formas graves de COVID-19. A classificação de risco categorizou os pacientes em risco baixo (1 a 9 pontos), risco médio (10 a 19 pontos) e risco alto (20 a 36 pontos). Em seguida, a teleconsulta foi agendada conforme disponibilidade do paciente por meio do método SBAR para comunicação efetiva e ao término do atendimento um plano de cuidados com Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem ­ SAE era encaminhado ao paciente por meio de WhatsApp ou e-mail. Conclusão: A plataforma de teleconsulta possibilitou a triagem dos pacientes, reduziu as visitas desnecessárias às unidades de emergência, permitiu a avaliação e monitoramento dos casos, bem como o acompanhamento de pacientes ambulatoriais que não necessitam de avaliação presencial.

Objective: To develop a virtual Teleconsultation platform for care of suspected cases of influenza syndromes and infection by COVID-19. Methodology: This is a study of applied nature, with development of technological and innovative production, prospective, ecological, descriptive, time series. The study population was made up of any person symptomatic for COVID-19 influenza syndromes, suspected or confirmed, from any location in Brazil. This study was conducted in two stages, namely: Stage I: Development of the Application for Teleconsultation Platform. Stage II: care through Teleconsultation of suspected cases of COVID-19 and influenza syndromes. The methodology used to develop the proposed application was evolutionary prototyping modeling. Results: There were 209 consultations in the Teleconsultation Platform, 151 (70%) were female and 65 (30%) were male, with prevalence of age ranging from 20 to 29 years (41%). As for the risk of infection by COVID-19, 42 (20%) had high risk, 75 (36%) medium risk and 92 (44%) low risk. The most prevalent symptoms were: nasal discharge or sneezing (53%), body aches (49%), headache (47%), sore throat (46%), dry cough (35%), fever (31%), shortness of breath (25%), and diarrhea (23%). Initially, the telecare was composed of teletry with risk classification based on the symptomatology of the patients who were coded with scores according to symptom severity for severe forms of COVID-19. The risk classification categorized patients into low risk (1 to 9 points), medium risk (10 to 19 points), and high risk (20 to 36 points). Then, the teleconsultation was scheduled according to the patient's availability through the SBAR method for effective communication and at the end of the service a care plan with Nursing Assistance Systematization - SAE was forwarded to the patient through WhatsApp or e-mail. Conclusion: Teleconsultation platform enabled patient triage, reduced unnecessary visits to emergency units, allowed the evaluation and monitoring of cases, as well as the follow- up of outpatients who do not need face-to-face evaluation.

Objetivo: Desarrollar una plataforma de Teleconsulta virtual para atender casos sospechosos de síndromes gripales e infección por COVID-19. Metodología: Se trata de un estudio aplicado, con desarrollo de producción tecnológica e innovadora, prospectivo, ecológico, descriptivo, con serie de tiempo. La población de estudio estuvo formada por cualquier persona sintomática de síndromes gripales por COVID-19, sospechada o confirmada, de cualquier localidad de Brasil. Este estudio se realizó en dos etapas, a saber: Etapa I: Desarrollo de Aplicaciones para la Plataforma de Teleconsulta. Etapa II: atención mediante teleconsulta de casos sospechosos de COVID-19 y síndromes gripales. La metodología utilizada para el desarrollo de la aplicación propuesta fue el modelado por prototipo evolutivo. Resultados: Se realizaron 209 consultas en la Plataforma de Teleconsulta, 151 (70%) del sexo femenino y 65 (30%) del masculino, con prevalencia de edades entre 20 a 29 años (41%). En cuanto al riesgo de infección por COVID-19, 42 (20%) fueron de alto riesgo, 75 (36%) de riesgo medio y 92 (44%) de bajo riesgo. Los síntomas más prevalentes fueron: secreción nasal o estornudos (53%), dolor de cuerpo (49%), dolor de cabeza (47%), dolor de garganta (46%), tos seca (35%), fiebre (31%), falta de aliento (25%) y diarrea (23%). Inicialmente, la teleasistencia consistía en teleselección con clasificación de riesgo en función de la sintomatología de los pacientes a los que se codificaba con puntuaciones según la gravedad del síntoma para formas graves de COVID-19. La clasificación de riesgo clasificó a los pacientes en riesgo bajo (1 a 9 puntos), riesgo medio (10 a 19 puntos) y riesgo alto (20 a 36 puntos). Luego, se programó la teleconsulta de acuerdo a la disponibilidad del paciente a través del método SBAR para una comunicación efectiva y al final de la atención se remitió al paciente un plan de cuidados con Sistematización de Atención de Enfermería - SAE vía WhatsApp o correo electrónico. Conclusión: La plataforma de teleconsulta posibilitó el triaje de pacientes, redujo las visitas innecesarias a las unidades de emergencia, permitió la evaluación y seguimiento de casos, así como el seguimiento de pacientes ambulatorios que no requieren evaluación presencial.

Dificuldades enfrentadas pelos profissionais de saúde no atendimento de emergências em unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil / Difficulties faced by health professionals in emergency care in primary health care units in Brazil / Dificultades enfrentadas por los profesionales de salud en la atención de emergencias en unidades básicas de salud en Brasil

Objetivos: compreender as dificuldades enfrentadas pelos profissionais de saúde para o atendimento de casos de urgências/emergências em unidades básica de saúde e identificar as proposições de resolubilidade. Métodos: Pesquisa qualitativa, realizada com dez profissionais de saúde, em uma unidade básica de saúde do interior paulista. As entrevistas foram transcritas e analisadas utilizando-se a estratégia metodológica do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo. Resultados: As dificuldades foram atreladas a fatores como despreparo da equipe, falta de infraestrutura, insumos e equipamentos, carência de profissional médico, pouca aproximação das unidades básicas de saúde com o setor de emergência hospitalar e escasso investimento do município para realização desses atendimentos. As proposições de melhorias destacaram a necessidade de capacitação dos profissionais de saúde, investimentos em recursos materiais e equipamentos, permanência de médico em período integral no serviço, implantação de protocolos de atendimento e empenho dos gestores. Conclusão: Os discursos evidenciaram que o serviço não tem condições de atender casos de urgência/emergência, em virtude do despreparo da equipe e da falta de recursos humanos e materiais. Além disso, não é prioridade do município oferecer condições mínimas para a realização deste atendimento nas unidades básicas de saúde, para que sejam integrantes da rede de atenção de Atenção às Urgências no Sistema Único de Saúde.

Objective: understand the difficulties health professionals face in urgency/emergency care at primary health care units and identify the propositions of problem-solving ability. Methods: Qualitative research, conducted with ten health professionals at a primary health care unit in the interior of São Paulo. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the methodological strategy of the collective subject discourse. Results: The difficulties were linked to factors such as unpreparedness of the team, lack of infrastructure, supplies and equipment, lack of medical professional, little cooperation between the primary health care units and the hospital emergency sector and scarce investment of the municipality to carry out these services. The proposals for improvements highlighted the need for training of health professionals, investments in material resources and equipment, full-time presence of physician at the service, implementation of care protocols and commitment of managers. Conclusion: The discourse showed that the service is not able to attend urgency/emergency cases, due to the unpreparedness of the team and the lack of human and material resources. In addition, the municipality does not prioritize the supply of minimum conditions for this care in primary health care units to make them part of the emergency care network in the Unified Health System.

Objetivo: comprender las dificultades enfrentadas por los profesionales de salud para la atención de casos de Urgencias/Emergencias en unidades básicas de salud e identificar las proposiciones de resolubilidad. Métodos: Investigación cualitativa, desarrollada con diez profesionales de salud, en una unidad básica de salud del interior paulista. Las entrevistas fueron transcritas y analizadas utilizando la estrategia metodológica del Discurso del Sujeto Colectivo. Resultados: Las dificultades fueron ligadas a factores como la falta de preparación del equipo, falta de infraestructura, insumos y equipamientos, carencia de profesional médico, poca aproximación de las unidades básicas de salud con el sector de emergencia hospitalaria y escasa inversión del municipio para realizar esas atenciones. Las propuestas de mejorías destacaron la necesidad de capacitación de los profesionales de salud, inversiones en recursos materiales y equipamientos, permanencia de médico a tiempo completo en el servicio, implantación de protocolos de atención y empeño de los gestores. Conclusión: Los discursos evidenciaron que el servicio no tiene condiciones de atender casos de urgencia/emergencia, en virtud de la falta de preparación del equipo y de la falta de recursos humanos y materiales. Además, no es prioridad del municipio ofrecer condiciones mínimas para la realización de esta atención en las unidades básicas de salud, para que sean integrantes de la red de atención de atención a las urgencias en el Sistema Único de Salud.

Modelo de atención sanitaria a la infancia y adolescencia en Atención Primaria. La realidad de una atención integral compartida / Health Care Model for Children and Adolescents in Primary Care. The reality of shared comprehensive care

En la actualidad, el modelo de asistencia sanitaria a la población infantojuvenil en Atención Primaria es variable en todo el territorio nacional. La Atención Primaria es el primer contacto del paciente pediátrico y su familia, atención que mayoritariamente recaía sobre el pediatra y que debe ser abordada de forma integral por las categorías profesionales implicadas en la promoción, educación para la salud y atención integral del menor, como son el pediatra, la enfermería pediátrica y la enfermería referente de centro educativos. El pediatra y el enfermero de Pediatría son los profesionales formados adecuadamente para atender a la población infantojuvenil en la Atención Primaria y una buena atención requiere de la interdependencia de ambos profesionales y de la cooperación con otras figuras profesionales del centro educativo y del centro de salud. Son necesarias actividades de salud comunitaria y trabajar con los activos de la comunidad para conseguir una atención sanitaria basada en la equidad y en la calidad desde una perspectiva global del niño en su naturaleza biopsicosocial. (AU)

Currently, the health care model for the paediatric and juvenile population in primary care varies throughout Spain. Primary care is the first contact for paediatric patients and their families, care that was mainly provided by paediatricians and which must be addressed in an integrated manner by the professional categories involved in the promotion, health education and comprehensive care of children, such as paediatricians, paediatric nurses and nurses in charge of educational centres. The paediatrician and the paediatric nurse are the professionals adequately trained to care for the paediatric population in primary care and good care requires the interdependence of both professionals and cooperation with other professional figures in the educational centre and the health centre. Community health activities are necessary, working with the assets of the community to achieve health care based on equity and quality from a global perspective of the child in his or her biopsychosocial nature. (AU)

How new clinical roles in primary care impact on equitable distribution of workforce: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There are inequalities in the geographical distribution of the primary care workforce in England. Primary care networks (PCNs), and the associated Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) funding, have stimulated employment of new healthcare roles. However, it is not clear whether this will impact inequalities. AIM: To examine whether the ARRS impacted inequality in the distribution of the primary care workforce. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective before-and-after study of English PCNs in 2019 and 2022. METHOD: The study combined workforce, population, and deprivation data at network level for March 2019 and March 2022. The change was estimated between 2019 and 2022 in the slope index of inequality (SII) across deprivation of full-time equivalent (FTE) GPs (total doctors, qualified GPs, and doctors-in-training), nurses, direct patient care, administrative, ARRS and non- ARRS, and total staff per 10 000 patients. RESULTS: A total of 1255 networks were included. Nurses and qualified GPs decreased in number while all other staff roles increased, with ARRS staff having the greatest increase. There was a pro- rich change in the SII for administrative staff (-0.482, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.841 to -0.122, P<0.01) and a pro- poor change for doctors-in-training (0.161, 95% CI = 0.049 to 0.274, P<0.01). Changes in distribution of all other staff types were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Between 2019 and 2022 the distribution of administrative staff became less pro-poor, and doctors-in-training became pro-poor. The changes in inequality in all other staff groups were mixed. The introduction of PCNs has not substantially changed the longstanding inequalities in the geographical distribution of the primary care workforce.

An AI-Enhanced Electronic Health Record Could Boost Primary Care Productivity.

This Viewpoint discusses ways that artificial intelligence (AI) may improve the productivity of primary care physicians with easier and more accurate use of AI-enhanced electronic health records.

Integrating Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Into Primary Care Settings.

Importance: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (eg, buprenorphine and naltrexone) can be offered in primary care, but barriers to implementation exist. Objective: To evaluate an implementation intervention over 2 years to explore experiences and perspectives of multidisciplinary primary care (PC) teams initiating or expanding MOUD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey-based and ethnographic qualitative study was conducted at 12 geographically and structurally diverse primary care clinics that enrolled in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study from July 2020 to July 2022 and included PC teams (prescribing clinicians, nonprescribing behavioral health care managers, and consulting psychiatrists). Survey data analysis was conducted from February to April 2022. Exposure: Implementation intervention (external practice facilitation) to integrate OUD treatment alongside existing collaborative care for mental health services. Measures: Data included (1) quantitative surveys of primary care teams that were analyzed descriptively and triangulated with qualitative results and (2) qualitative field notes from ethnographic observation of clinic implementation meetings analyzed using rapid assessment methods. Results: Sixty-two primary care team members completed the survey (41 female individuals [66%]; 1 [2%] American Indian or Alaskan Native, 4 [7%] Asian, 5 [8%] Black or African American, 5 [8%] Hispanic or Latino, 1 [2%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 46 [4%] White individuals), of whom 37 (60%) were between age 25 and 44 years. An analysis of implementation meetings (n = 362) and survey data identified 4 themes describing multilevel factors associated with PC team provision of MOUD during implementation, with variation in their experience across clinics. Themes characterized challenges with clinical administrative logistics that limited the capacity to provide rapid access to care and patient engagement as well as clinician confidence to discuss aspects of MOUD care with patients. These challenges were associated with conflicting attitudes among PC teams toward expanding MOUD care. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this survey and qualitative study of PC team perspectives suggest that PC teams need flexibility in appointment scheduling and the capacity to effectively engage patients with OUD as well as ongoing training to maintain clinician confidence in the face of evolving opioid-related clinical issues. Future work should address structural challenges associated with workload burden and limited schedule flexibility that hinder MOUD expansion in PC settings.

Comparison of nutrition care services for adult obesity at primary care in two different periods in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Dietitians are healthcare professionals with potential roles and impacts in primary care (PC) settings when applying knowledge and expertise to educate healthcare clients at all levels and treat chronic diseases. This study seeks to compare and evaluate the nutrition care services and practices in obesity management in primary care centres for two periods (2016 and 2019) in Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Surveys with service self-reporting evaluation used responses from 18 and 27 centres in 2016 and 2019. Services evaluation used no reference to a standard, but 18 of the surveyed PC centres in 2019 were previously visited in 2016 to assess the provided nutrition care services for adult obesity in PC centres. The re-visit survey investigated improvements in services achieved in 2019 concerning services for adults with obesity. A chi-square test was used to compare the surveys' results in the two periods, which resulted in a significant difference in the provided nutrition care services for adult obesity between 2016 and 2019. RESULTS: Dietitians' employment has significantly changed (P < .0001) in 2019 compared to 2016. Dietitians were significantly noticed as the primary source of nutrition information after their integration into the services (P < .0001) in 2019. Services provided for adult obesity increased significantly (P value < .0001) in the second phase. However, there was no significant difference in serving adult groups between the two periods (P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating dietitians into the PC services significantly enhanced their role in supporting PC services for conditions relating to adult obesity, which allowed them to be the most important source of the delivered nutrition information to patients. The employment rate of PC dietitians accredited by the governing body is significantly increasing; the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties will need to monitor it to ensure that dietitians have the qualifications and skills to provide professional medical nutrition therapy to patients. Further research to evaluate the quality of PC dietetic practice and improvements in patient outcomes is required to strengthen the importance of integrating registered dietitians into the services.

Evaluación quinquenal de los ejes sanitarios de un programa nacional de Atención Primaria de la Salud / Five-year evaluation of the sanitary axes of a national program of Primary Health Care

Se realizó una evaluación quinquenal de los ejes sanitarios (que dan lugar a objetivos estratégicos con sus correspondientes metas e indicadores, áreas de intervención y líneas de acción) dentro del marco de la gestión sanitaria de uno de los 10 principales agentes de la seguridad social argentinos quien implementaba desde hacía 20 años un Programa Nacional de Atención Primaria de la Salud (PNAPS). El mismo promedió alrededor de 800 mil beneficiarios anuales dentro de una red asistencial nacional propia en el primer nivel de atención compuesta por 45 Centros de Atención Primaria (CAPs). Se implementó una investigación evaluativa que incluyó un trazado de línea de base con la valoración de cinco Ejes Sanitarios (ES). Se trata de un diseño de corte transversal de un periodo de 5 años. Se definieron metas, indicadores y recomendaciones para cada uno de los ES, recopilando información de fuentes diferentes y complementarias para su análisis. Los resultados mostraron una evolución favorable en el período evaluado, aunque el cumplimiento de las metas estuvo bastante alejado de lo propuesto de manera teórica. Conclusiones: este trabajo aporta información valiosa y original para subsidiar la toma de decisiones e incentivar la investigación en el ámbito de la APS, buscando reformular los actuales modelos de gestión y de atención de la salud (AU)

A five-year evaluation of the health axes (which give rise to strategic objectives with their corresponding goals and indicators, areas of intervention and lines of action) was carried out within the framework of health management of one of the 10 main argentine social security agents who had been implementing a National Primary Health Care Program (PNAPS) for 20 years. It averaged around 800,000 annual beneficiaries within its own national care network at the first level of care made up of 45 Primary Care Centers (CAPs). An evaluative investigation was implemented that included a baseline drawing with the assessment of five Sanitary Axis (ES). It is a cross-sectional design of a period of 5 years. Goals, indicators and recommendations were defined for each of the ES, collecting information from different and complementary sources for analysis. Results: they showed a favorable evolution in the period evaluated, although the fulfillment of the goals was quite far from what was theoretically proposed. The results of this work provides valuable and original information to support decision-making and encourage research in the field of PHC, seeking to reformulate current management and health care models (AU)

Comparison of Work Patterns Between Physicians and Advanced Practice Practitioners in Primary Care and Specialty Practice Settings.

Importance: Despite the increasing involvement of advanced practice practitioners (APPs; ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in care delivery across specialties, the work patterns of APPs compared with physicians and how they are integrated into care teams have not been well characterized. Objective: To characterize differences between physicians and APPs across specialty types related to days with appointments, visit types seen, and time spent using the electronic health record (EHR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, cross-sectional study used EHR data from physicians and APPs (ie, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) at all US institutions that used Epic Systems' EHR between January and May 2021. Data analysis was performed from March 2022 to April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Appointment scheduling patterns, percentage of new and established and level of evaluation and management (E/M) visits, and EHR use metrics per day and week. Results: The sample consisted of 217 924 clinicians across 389 organizations, including 174 939 physicians and 42 985 APPs. Although primary care physicians were more likely than APPs to have more than 3 days per week with appointments (50 921 physicians [79.5%] vs 17 095 APPs [77.9%]), this trend was reversed for medical (38 645 physicians [64.8%] vs 8124 APPs [74.0%]) and surgical (24 155 physicians [47.1%] vs 5198 APPs [51.7%]) specialties. Medical and surgical specialty physicians saw 6.7 and 7.4 percentage points, respectively, more new patient visits than did their APP counterparts, whereas primary care physicians saw 2.8 percentage points fewer new patient visits than did APPs. Physicians saw a greater percentage of level 4 or 5 visits across all specialties. Medical and surgical physicians spent 34.3 and 45.8 fewer minutes per day, respectively, using the EHR than did APPs in their specialties, whereas primary care physicians spent 17.7 minutes per day more. These differences translated to primary care physicians spending 96.3 minutes more per week using the EHR than APPs, whereas medical and surgical physicians spent 149.9 and 140.7 fewer minutes, respectively, than did their APP counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional, national study of clinicians found significant differences in visit and EHR patterns for physicians compared with APPs across specialty types. By underscoring the different current usage of physicians vs APPs across specialty types, this study helps place into context the work and visit patterns of physicians compared with APPs and serves as a foundation for evaluations of clinical outcomes and quality.

Plan Global para el desarrollo de actuaciones sobre población socialmente vulnerable con perspectiva comunitaria / Global Plan for the development of actions on population socially vulnerable with a community perspective

Los sistemas sanitarios, acostumbrados a implementar planes, programas y acciones fundamentadas en sólidas evidencias científicas, han tenido que reinventarse para tratar de gestionar lo más eficaz y eficientemente unapandemia mundial sin precedentes que casi diariamente cambiaba el escenario sobre el que actuar. Siendo conscientes de que toda crisis, incluidaesta, acentúa las desigualdades sociales y sus consecuencias, se hizo necesario desarrollar una serie de acciones que trataran de mitigar en lo posiblesus efectos sobre la salud y bienestar de la población. Inicialmente se tratóde reaccionar ante los requerimientos que diariamente iban surgiendo yposteriormente se fueron incorporando los aprendizajes adquiridos desdeun enfoque más anticipatorio, evolucionando desde intervenciones individuales a poblacionales, para retornar al final del Plan a lo que nunca debiósituarse en un segundo plano, el trabajo comunitario. Con el objetivo de describir de manera sencilla las tres etapas de desarrollo del Plan Global mediante una estructura similar que facilite la comprensión al lector/a, se describen a continuación los objetivos, acciones yuna aproximación a los resultados de cada una de las tres fases.(AU)

Estimated Costs of Intervening in Health-Related Social Needs Detected in Primary Care.

Importance: Health-related social needs are increasingly being screened for in primary care practices, but it remains unclear how much additional financing is required to address those needs to improve health outcomes. Objective: To estimate the cost of implementing evidence-based interventions to address social needs identified in primary care practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision analytical microsimulation of patients seen in primary care practices, using data on social needs from the National Center for Health Statistics from 2015 through 2018 (N = 19 225) was conducted. Primary care practices were categorized as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), non-FQHC urban practices in high-poverty areas, non-FQHC rural practices in high-poverty areas, and practices in lower-poverty areas. Data analysis was performed from March 3 to December 16, 2022. Intervention: Simulated evidence-based interventions of primary care-based screening and referral protocols, food assistance, housing programs, nonemergency medical transportation, and community-based care coordination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was per-person per-month cost of interventions. Intervention costs that have existing federally funded financing mechanisms (eg, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and costs without such an existing mechanism were tabulated. Results: Of the population included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 34.4 (25.9) years, and 54.3% were female. Among people with food and housing needs, most were program eligible for federally funded programs, but had low enrollment (eg, due to inadequate program capacity), with 78.0% of people with housing needs being program eligible vs 24.0% enrolled, and 95.6% of people with food needs being program eligible vs 70.2% enrolled. Among those with transportation insecurity and care coordination needs, eligibility criteria limited enrollment (26.3% of those in need being program eligible for transportation programs, and 5.7% of those in need being program eligible for care coordination programs). The cost of providing evidence-based interventions for these 4 domains averaged $60 (95% CI, $55-$65) per member per month (including approximately $5 for screening and referral management in clinics), of which $27 (95% CI, $24-$31) (45.8%) was federally funded. While disproportionate funding was available to populations seen at FQHCs, populations seen at non-FQHC practices in high-poverty areas had larger funding gaps (intervention costs not borne by existing federal funding mechanisms). Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision analytical microsimulation study, food and housing interventions were limited by low enrollment among eligible people, whereas transportation and care coordination interventions were more limited by narrow eligibility criteria. Screening and referral management in primary care was a small expenditure relative to the cost of interventions to address social needs, and just under half of the costs of interventions were covered by existing federal funding mechanisms. These findings suggest that many resources are necessary to address social needs that fall largely outside of existing federal financing mechanisms.

Oral cancer care in the "Metropolitan I" health region in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: enabling and constraining factors. / Atenção ao câncer bucal na região de saúde Metropolitana I do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: fatores facilitadores e coercitivos.

The aim was to identify constraining and enabling factors related to the organization of health care networks that influence access to oral cancer diagnosis and treatment. A case study in the "Metropolitan I" health region using data collected from health information systems and 26 semi-structured interviews with health managers and professionals. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and strategic conduct analysis, drawing on the theory of structuration proposed by Giddens. The findings reveal that coverage of oral health care in primary care services is generally low and prioritizes specific groups and urgent cases, hampering access to oral cancer diagnosis. While the presence of a network of secondary care services in the municipalities that make up the health region facilitates diagnosis, there are major barriers to treatment. Informal partnerships established with dental schools play an important role in diagnosis, but do not receive funding. The regulation of appointments for diagnosis was not restrictive. In contrast, the regulation of referrals for treatment lacked transparency, was subject to long delays, and shortage of places. Despite advances, constraining factors related to structure and the actions of agents involved in the care process persist, hampering the timely diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer.

O objetivo foi identificar os fatores facilitadores e coercitivos da organização da rede de atenção à saúde que intervêm sobre o acesso ao diagnóstico e tratamento do câncer bucal. Um estudo de caso da região de saúde Metropolitana I do estado do Rio de Janeiro, com coleta de dados em sistemas de informação e 26 entrevistas com gestores e profissionais. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio das técnicas de estatística descritiva e análise temática, à luz da Teoria da Estruturação de Giddens. Identificou-se baixa cobertura de saúde bucal na atenção básica, com priorização do acesso a grupos prioritários e urgências, dificultando o acesso ao diagnóstico do câncer bucal neste nível de atenção. A presença da rede secundária em todos os municípios da região facilita o diagnóstico, porém há limites para o acesso ao tratamento. Faculdades de odontologia atuam no diagnóstico como rede informal, ação importante, mas não financiada. A regulação para o diagnóstico não foi restritiva, mas para o tratamento a regulação foi considerada pouco transparente e demorada, com falta de vagas. Apesar dos avanços, persistem fatores coercitivos estruturais e nas ações dos agentes que restringem diagnóstico e tratamento oportuno do câncer bucal.